Legal Opinion

Palmer v. Diel

Appellate Court of Illinois

Decided July 7, 1924PublishedCited by 1 opinion

1Opinion of the Court

Mr. Presiding Justice Barry

delivered the opinion of the court.

Appellee owns 35 shares of the capital stock of the First National Bank of Noble, Illinois, of which appellant is the cashier. Appellant has the custody and control of the books and records of the bank and refused to permit appellee to inspect the same upon a demand duly made in writing. There is no controversy as to these facts. The court awarded a writ of mandamus against appellant requiring him to permit appellee to examine the books and records.

Section 38 of the Corporations Act [Cahill’s Ill. St. ch. 32, ¶ 38] gives appellee…

2Cases cited8 opinions

  1. Mayer v. BrensingerIllinois Supreme Court · 1899
  2. Venner v. Chicago City Railway Co.Illinois Supreme Court · 1910
  3. Swift v. State ex rel. RichardsonSupreme Court of Delaware · 1886
  4. State ex rel. Bergenthal v. BergenthalWisconsin Supreme Court · 1888
  5. Winter v. BaldwinSupreme Court of Alabama · 1889

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by1 opinion

  1. Miller v. SpanogleAppellate Court of Illinois · 1934

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API