Legal Opinion

Augusta Grocery Co. v. Southern Moline Plow Co.

Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit

Decided February 5, 1914No. 1192PublishedCited by 3 opinions

Petition for Revision of Proceedings of the District Court of the United States for the Eastern District of South Carolina, at Columbia, in bankruptcy; Henry A. M. Smith, Judge. In the matter of the Rutland-Perry Company, bankrupt. On petition by the Augusta Grocery Company to review an order reversing an order of the referee relative to the disposition of the proceeds of property sold the bankrupt by the Southern Moline Plow Company.

1Opinion of the Court

PRITCHARD, Circuit Judge.

This is a petition to superintend and revise,, in matter of law, proceedings of the District Court of the1 United States for the Eastern District of South Carolina.

On the 18th day of January, 1913, the Rutland-Perry Company, a corporation organized under the laws of South Carolina, was adjudged bankrupt, and thereafter a trustee was duly appointed who, with other chattels, took into his custody certain vehicles which were conditionally sold by the Southern Moline Plow Company, to the bankrupt. The terms and conditions under which the sale was made were in writing and…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. In re Williamsburg Knitting MillDistrict Court, E.D. Virginia · 1911
  2. Millikin v. Second Nat. Bank of BaltimoreCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 1913
  3. Federal Chemical Co. v. HouseDistrict Court, N.D. Georgia · 1912
  4. In re KreugerDistrict Court, E.D. Kentucky · 1912

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. Industrial Finance Corp. v. CapplemannCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 1922
  2. In re M. L. B. Sturkey Co.District Court, W.D. South Carolina · 1915
  3. In re SmithDistrict Court, E.D. South Carolina · 1943

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API