Legal Opinion
Karali v. Araujo
New York Supreme Court
Decided June 16, 2015PublishedCited by 2 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION OF THE COURT
Elizabeth H. Emerson, J.
It is ordered that this motion by the defendants for summary judgment dismissing the complaint is granted; and it is further ordered that the defendants’ counterclaim is severed; and it is further ordered that the parties are directed to proceed to trial on the counterclaim.
The facts of this case have already been determined in the related action (Grand Bank for Sav. v Araujo Familia, Inc., 2012 NY Slip Op 33123[U] [Sup Ct, Suffolk County 2012, Farneti, J.]).
On November 24, 2008, Ufuk and Bayrak Karali (the Karalis) sold a parcel of commercial real…
2Cases cited10 opinions
- Grogan v. GarnerSupreme Court of the United States · 1991
- Brown v. FelsenSupreme Court of the United States · 1979
- O'Brien v. City of SyracuseNew York Court of Appeals · 1981
- Green v. Santa Fe Industries, Inc.New York Court of Appeals · 1987
- First Bank of the Americas v. Motor Car Funding, Inc.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1999
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by2 opinions
- Intrepid Investments, LLC v. London Bay Capital, LLCCourt of Chancery of Delaware · 2023
- Kraus USA, Inc. v. MagarikDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 2019