State v. Holland
Supreme Court of South Carolina
1DissentBussey, Justice
(dissenting) :
Being of the view that there was prejudicial error requiring a new trial, I most respectfully dissent. To better understand the issues a few additional facts need to be stated. The organizational structure of the club known as the “Tribulators” included “prospects” (those persons being considered for membership) ; “probates” (those persons already accepted conditionally as members); and “patchwearers” (those persons already members with full rights). The officers of the club were, of course, “patchwearers”. There was a president and “enforcer”, Richard Lee Richards alias…
2Cases cited4 opinions
- State v. HollmanSupreme Court of South Carolina · 1958
- State v. LylesSupreme Court of South Carolina · 1947
- State v. StevensSupreme Court of South Carolina · 1921
- State v. ParlerSupreme Court of South Carolina · 1950