Legal Opinion · Dissent

State v. Holland

Supreme Court of South Carolina

Decided November 28, 1973No. 19729Published

1DissentBussey, Justice

(dissenting) :

Being of the view that there was prejudicial error requiring a new trial, I most respectfully dissent. To better understand the issues a few additional facts need to be stated. The organizational structure of the club known as the “Tribulators” included “prospects” (those persons being considered for membership) ; “probates” (those persons already accepted conditionally as members); and “patchwearers” (those persons already members with full rights). The officers of the club were, of course, “patchwearers”. There was a president and “enforcer”, Richard Lee Richards alias…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. State v. HollmanSupreme Court of South Carolina · 1958
  2. State v. LylesSupreme Court of South Carolina · 1947
  3. State v. StevensSupreme Court of South Carolina · 1921
  4. State v. ParlerSupreme Court of South Carolina · 1950

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API