Legal Opinion

Matter of Hutter Const. Co., Inc.

United States Bankruptcy Court, E.D. Wisconsin

Decided May 13, 1991No. 19-21550PublishedCited by 10 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

AMENDED DECISION ON APPLICATIONS FOR COMPENSATION FOR MICHAEL, BEST & FRIEDRICH

RUSSELL A. EISENBERG, Bankruptcy Judge.

BASICS

This Decision pertains to all fee applications of Michael, Best & Friedrich (“MB & F”). Since this case was commenced on December 5, 1988, MB & F has represented the debtor, Hutter Construction Co., Inc. (“HCCI”). It also represented two other related Chapter 11 debtors, THCC Corp. (“THCC”) and Acqui Holding Corp. (“Ac-qui” or “AHC”). All three cases were commenced on the same day. Substantially all assets available for creditors with unsecured claims were in the HCCI…

2Cases cited23 opinions

  1. Hensley v. EckerhartSupreme Court of the United States · 1983
  2. Johnson v. Georgia Highway Express, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1974
  3. Business Guides, Inc. v. Chromatic Communications Enterprises, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1991
  4. In Re Nucorp Energy, Inc., an Ohio Corporation, and Its Affiliates, Debtors. Luce, Forward, Hamilton & ScrippsCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1985
  5. In Re WildmanUnited States Bankruptcy Court, N.D. Illinois · 1987

18 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by10 opinions

  1. In Re MatthewsUnited States Bankruptcy Court, W.D. Texas · 1993
  2. In Re East Peoria Hotel Corp.United States Bankruptcy Court, C.D. Illinois · 1991
  3. In Re Gold Seal Products Co., Inc.United States Bankruptcy Court, N.D. Alabama · 1991
  4. In Re Cumberland Farms, Inc.United States Bankruptcy Court, D. Massachusetts · 1993
  5. Hennigan Bennett & Dorman LLP v. Goldin Associates L.L.C. (In Re Worldwide Direct Inc.)United States Bankruptcy Court, D. Delaware · 2005

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API