Legal Opinion

Creswell Trading Co. v. United States

United States Court of International Trade

Decided June 24, 1998No. Slip Op. 98-87; Court. No. 91-01-00012Published

1Opinion of the Court

ORDER

DiCARLO, Senior Judge.

In accordance with the decision (April 16, 1998) and mandate (June 8, 1998) of the *1265United States Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit, Appeal Nos. 97-1486 and 97-1487, affirming-in-part and reversing-in-part this court’s decision in Creswell Trading Co. v. United States, 21 CIT ——, 964 F.Supp. 409 (1997) [hereinafter Creswell V], it is hereby

ORDERED that the portion of this court’s opinion and order in Creswell V holding that oceanic shipping costs did not constitute countervailable subsidies is vacated, and it is further

ORDERED that Commerce shall recalculate…

2Cases cited1 opinion

  1. Creswell Trading Co., Inc. South Bay Foundry 1989 v. United StatesUnited States Court of International Trade · 1997

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API