Legal Opinion

United States v. Robert E. Nims and Laurence L. Lagarde, Sr.

Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit

Decided December 5, 1975No. 74-1591PublishedCited by 21 opinions

1Per curiam

Appellants Nims and LaGarde were found guilty by a jury of violating 18 U.S.C.A. § 1952 1 (interstate travel in aid of racketeering), § 1955 2 (illegal gam bling business), and § 2 3 (aiding and abetting). Their convictions arose out of the shipment of pinball machines from the Bally Company, William O’Donnell, President, in Chicago to Boasberg and his company, the New Orleans Novelty Company, in New Orleans. Boasberg was the distributor for Bally in the New Orleans area. He distributed the machines to novelty and amusement companies which in turn contracted with various bars and restaurants…

2Cases cited10 opinions

  1. Kotteakos v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1946
  2. Pinkerton v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1946
  3. Pereira v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1954
  4. Schaffer v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1960
  5. United States v. RabinowichSupreme Court of the United States · 1915

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by21 opinions

  1. United States v. Glen Sutherland, Edward Maynard and Grace WalkerCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1981
  2. United States v. Thomas Richard Warner, Michael Charles WardCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1982
  3. United States v. Sidney Levine and Mpd Film Productions, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1977
  4. United States v. ThreadgillCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1999
  5. United States v. Lenin Juarez and Oscar JuarezCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1978

16 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API