Legal Opinion

Dolan v. State

Nebraska Supreme Court

Decided April 5, 1895No. 6913PublishedCited by 9 opinions

Error to the district court for' Lancaster county. Tried1 below before Tibbets, J. The court erred in not instructing the jury that under-the information the prisoner could be convicted of assault and battery. (Thurman v. State, 32 Neb., 224; Penderson v. State, 21 Tex. App., 485.)

1Opinion of the CourtPost, J.

This was a prosecution in the district court for Lancaster ■county on an information charging the crime of assault with intent to murder. A verdict was returned finding the accused guilty as charged, and a motion for a new trial having been overruled, he was sentenced to a term in the penitentiary, which he seeks to reverse by means of this proceeding. *

The only assignment which we shall notice is that the charge of the court excluded from the consideration of the jury the question of the defendant’s guilt of a lower grade of assault, and required them to convict, if at all, of the crime…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Carleton v. StateNebraska Supreme Court · 1895
  2. Vollmer v. StateNebraska Supreme Court · 1888
  3. State v. VinsantSupreme Court of Iowa · 1878

3Cited by9 opinions

  1. State v. DolanWashington Supreme Court · 1897
  2. Osborne v. StateNebraska Supreme Court · 1926
  3. Moore v. StateNebraska Supreme Court · 1946
  4. State v. BreakerNebraska Supreme Court · 1965
  5. Young v. StateNebraska Supreme Court · 1905

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API