Safeway Stores, Inc. v. Bolton
Court of Appeals of Maryland
1Opinion of the CourtSybErt, J.
The defendant in a personal injury suit complains in this appeal that the trial court erred in refusing to grant its motion for directed verdict or its motion for judgment n.o.v. made on the ground that no legally sufficient evidence of negligence on its part had been shown.
The appellee, Helen R. Bolton (plaintiff below) moved to dismiss the appeal for the reason that appellant, Safeway Stores, Inc. (defendant below) has allegedly failed to set forth in the record extract all matters necessary for the determination of the issue raised in the appeal, as required by Maryland Rule 828. We find…
2Cases cited8 opinions
- Smith v. BernfeldCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1961
- Maszczenski v. MyersCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1957
- Evans v. Hot Shoppes, Inc.Court of Appeals of Maryland · 1960
- Coastal Tank Lines, Inc. v. CarrollCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1954
- Nalee, Inc. v. JacobsCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1962
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by17 opinions
- Impala Platinum Ltd. v. Impala Sales (U.S.A.), Inc.Court of Appeals of Maryland · 1978
- Giant Food, Inc. v. MitchellCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1994
- Menish v. Polinger CompanyCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1976
- Lloyd v. BowlesCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1971
- Burkowske v. Church Hospital Corp.Court of Special Appeals of Maryland · 1982
12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.