Legal Opinion

L.A. Warehouse Co. v. Am. Distilling Co.

California Supreme Court

Decided June 30, 1943No. S. F. No. 16878PublishedCited by 4 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtSchauer, J.

This is an action by a bailee to recover from the bailor-owner moneys expended by the former in payment of an excise tax on the latter’s property. The judgment in favor of the plaintiff-bailee must be sustained.

The property involved was 2092.5 gallons of gin; exclusive of the tax it was worth 28 cents per gallon. The tax was the United States Internal Revenue excise on distilled *404spirits; it was imposed at the rate of $2.25 a gallon. Under the law (Int. Rev. Code, § 2800(a) (1) and (e), U.S.C.A., Title 26) such tax attached to the gin “as soon as this substance [came into] . . . existence as…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. Wolfe v. Willard H. George, Inc.California Court of Appeal · 1930
  2. Hirshfield v. Central Pacific RailRoadCalifornia Supreme Court · 1880

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. Muelder v. Western Greyhound LinesCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1970
  2. Robert Williams & Co. v. State Tax Commission of MissouriSupreme Court of Missouri · 1973
  3. Modlin v. Walter's Fur ShopCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1950
  4. Dade County v. Atlantic Liquor Co.Supreme Court of Florida · 1970

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API