Legal Opinion
ROSS, SR. v. ESSEX COUNTY SUPERIOR COURT
District Court, D. New Jersey
Decided June 12, 2024No. 2:23-cv-03122Unknown
1Opinion
NOT FOR PUBLICATION UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT DISTRICT OF NEW JERSEY HAROLD ANTHONY ROSS, SR., Plaintiff, No. 23¢v3122 (EP) (CLW) OPINION ESSEX COUNTY COURT, et al., Defendants. PADIN, District Judge. Pro se Plaintiff Harold Anthony Ross, Sr., alleges various civil rights violations against state court judges and an attorney involved in state family court proceedings. For the reasons below, the Court will DISMISS the action with prejudice. 1. BACKGROUND In his initial complaint, Plaintiff named as Defendants eight state court judges and an attorney.' D.E. 1 (“Complaint” or “Compl.”). Judge…
2Cases cited5 opinions
- Stump v. SparkmanSupreme Court of the United States · 1978
- Butz v. EconomouSupreme Court of the United States · 1978
- Bradley v. FisherSupreme Court of the United States · 1872
- Kareem Garrett v. Wexford HealthCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 2019
- Malinowski v. Documented Vehicle/Drivers Systems, Inc.Court of Appeals for the First Circuit · 2003