Hamilton v. Jeffrey Stone Co.
Supreme Court of Arkansas
1Opinion of the Court
Tom Glaze, Justice.
This is a workers’ compensation case that has been appealed to the court of appeals twice. In the first appeal, appellant argued two points: (1) the statutes of limitations pertaining to silicosis, Ark. Stat. Ann. §§ 81-1314(a)(7) and -1318(a)(2) (Repl. 1976), were unconstitutional because they violated the equal protection clause of the fourteenth amendment to the United States Constitution; but, if constitutional, (2) the statutes should be interpreted to run from the date of discovery or the time at which the claimant knows or should reasonably be expected to know of the…
2Cases cited4 opinions
- Hamilton v. Jeffrey Stone Co.Court of Appeals of Arkansas · 1982
- Woodard v. ITT Higbie Manufacturing Co.Court of Appeals of Arkansas · 1980
- T. J. Moss Tie & Timber Co. v. MartinSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1952
- Quality Excelsior Coal Co. v. SmithSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1961
3Cited by6 opinions
- Arkansas Health Services Agency v. Desiderata, Inc.Supreme Court of Arkansas · 1998
- Hamilton v. Jeffrey Stone Co.Court of Appeals of Arkansas · 1988
- Green v. Smith & Scott LoggingCourt of Appeals of Arkansas · 1996
- Hamilton v. Jeffrey Stone Co.Supreme Court of Arkansas · 1988
- Hamilton v. Jeffrey Stone Co.Court of Appeals of Arkansas · 1988
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.