Umber v. Umber
Supreme Court of Oklahoma
1Opinion of the Court
HODGES, Justice.
The principal question on appeal is whether the trial court properly determined that federal social security benefits received by the appellee were his separate property and not subject to division as property settlement in a divorce proceeding.
The parties owned and operated a pharmacy. The appellant, Novaline Umber, was a registered pharmacist and the appellee, Herbert L. Umber, managed the pharmacy. The wife did not receive a salary, although she worked four or five hours per day. Social security taxes were paid on the husband’s income. The wife did not request, nor did she…
2Cases cited10 opinions
- Flemming v. NestorSupreme Court of the United States · 1960
- In Re BurrusSupreme Court of the United States · 1890
- Hisquierdo v. HisquierdoSupreme Court of the United States · 1979
- Wissner v. WissnerSupreme Court of the United States · 1950
- Ohio Ex Rel. Popovici v. AglerSupreme Court of the United States · 1930
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by25 opinions
- Olson v. OlsonNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 1989
- Carpenter v. CarpenterSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1983
- Nelson v. NelsonSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1998
- Udall Ex Rel. State Treasurer v. UdallSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1980
- Matter of Marriage of Swan and SwanOregon Supreme Court · 1986
20 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.