Legal Opinion
Sentry Indemnity Company v. Central Electric Company, Inc.
Court of Appeals of Georgia
Decided October 20, 1975No. 51165PublishedCited by 3 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
Clark, Judge.
1. "Actions on completion bonds have been held to be good when brought in the name of the obligee for the use of materialmen, where the contract specifically provided that it would pay all persons furnishing labor and material under the contract, or words of similar import. Southern Surety Co. v. Dawes, 161 Ga. 207 (130 SE 577); Union Indemnity Co. v. Riley, 169 Ga. 229 (150 SE 216); American Surety Co. v. DeWald, 30 Ga. App. 606 (118 SE 703); Fidelity & Deposit Co. v. Pittman, 52 Ga. App. 394 (183 SE 572)... On the other hand, where the obligee was indemnified, but nothing else…
2Cases cited10 opinions
- American Surety Co. v. County of BibbSupreme Court of Georgia · 1926
- Glens Falls Indemnity Co. v. Southeastern Construction Co.Supreme Court of Georgia · 1950
- American Surety Co. v. DeWaldCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1923
- Southern Surety Co. v. DawesSupreme Court of Georgia · 1925
- Union Indemnity Co. v. RileySupreme Court of Georgia · 1929
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by3 opinions
- Houston General Insurance v. Brock Construction Co.Supreme Court of Georgia · 1978
- Sims' Crane Service, Inc. v. Reliance InsuranceDistrict Court, S.D. Georgia · 1981
- Houston General Insurance v. Brock Construction Co.Supreme Court of Georgia · 1978