Brady v. Lewless
Court of Appeals of Georgia
1Opinion
On Motion for Rehearing.
The dissent argues that there is no sound or justifiable reason for applying a different standard with regard to primary and contributory negligence. It is also urged that Code § 105-1806 is negative in character and merely sets the "ceiling” age at which the defense of infancy cannot be used. The Code section in question positively provides that those over the age of discretion and accountability for criminal offenses may not use infancy as a defense. However, as to those under such age, the Code section, by its very nature, just as unequivocally provides that infancy…
2Cases cited12 opinions
- Western & Atlantic Railroad v. YoungSupreme Court of Georgia · 1888
- Botts v. Southeastern Pipe-Line Co.Supreme Court of Georgia · 1940
- New Amsterdam Casualty Co. v. McFarleySupreme Court of Georgia · 1940
- Vickers v. Atlanta & West Point RailroadSupreme Court of Georgia · 1879
- Western & Atlantic Railroad v. YoungSupreme Court of Georgia · 1889
7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.