Legal Opinion
Castelli v. Abramo
City of New York Municipal Court
Decided May 25, 1956PublishedCited by 1 opinion
1Opinion of the CourtArthur Wachtel, J.
Plaintiff entered into a contract with defendants for the sale of his house for $10,800. It is not disputed that of said purchase price plaintiff has not been paid the sum of $700.
Defendants counterclaim in the amount of $700, on the ground that plaintiff fraudulently induced the defendants to enter into the contract of sale by failing to disclose to the defendants that the boiler in the said premises was defective to such an extent that it required major repairs or replacement. It is conceded that a red tag was placed on the boiler prior to the sale indicating that it had a defect.…
2Cases cited14 opinions
- Ultramares Corp. v. ToucheNew York Court of Appeals · 1931
- Reno v. . BullNew York Court of Appeals · 1919
- Stewart v. Wyoming Cattle Ranche Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1888
- Kountze v. . KennedyNew York Court of Appeals · 1895
- Vail v. . ReynoldsNew York Court of Appeals · 1890
9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by1 opinion
- Shults Ex Rel. Hornell Broadcasting Corp. v. HendersonDistrict Court, W.D. New York · 1986