Legal Opinion

In re the Estate of Goldstein

New York Surrogate's Court

Decided August 23, 1974PublishedCited by 11 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

John D. Bennett, S.

In these discovery proceedings the respondents move to vacate the order of inquiry obtained by the petitioner pursuant to SOPA 2103.

These discovery proceedings deal with specific items of recovery as well as possible rights afforded to the decedent’s estate pursuant to certain agreements. Respondents contend that since debts and contract obligations are involved, this court lacks jurisdiction over the subject matter and accordingly request that the proceedings be dismissed.

Under the narrowest construction of the jurisdiction of this court within SOPA 21 proceedings there is…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. In re the Estate of HallNew York Surrogate's Court · 1967
  2. In re the Estate of RungoNew York Surrogate's Court · 1973
  3. In re the Estate of LebowitzNew York Surrogate's Court · 1961
  4. In re the Estate of MillerNew York Surrogate's Court · 1958

3Cited by11 opinions

  1. In re the Estate of YoungNew York Surrogate's Court · 1975
  2. In re Jacqueline F.New York Surrogate's Court · 1978
  3. In re the Estate of FinkleNew York Surrogate's Court · 1977
  4. In re the Estate of BreitmanNew York Surrogate's Court · 1982
  5. In re the Estate of DeitchNew York Surrogate's Court · 1978

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API