Legal Opinion
Spodek v. Neiss
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York
Decided February 9, 2010PublishedCited by 9 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
—In an action, inter alia, to recover damages for breach of contract, the defendants, other than the defendants Moses Fried, Bernice Fried, and John Doe Nos. 1 through 10, appeal from an order of the Supreme Court, Nassau County (Lally, J.), dated July 2, 2009, which denied their motion to compel certain disclosure.
Ordered that the order is affirmed, with costs.
“The supervision of disclosure and the setting of reasonable terms and conditions therefor rests within the sound discretion of the trial court and, absent an improvident exercise of that discretion, its determination will not be…
2Cases cited4 opinions
- Storrar v. Board of EducationAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1999
- Kaplan v. HerbsteinAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1991
- Ito v. Dryvit Systems, Inc.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2004
- Olexa v. JacobsAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2007
3Cited by9 opinions
- Peluso v. Red Rose Restaurant, Inc.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2010
- JFK Family Ltd. Partnership v. Millbrae Natural Gas Development Fund 2005, L.P.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2011
- AAA Vascular Care, PLLC v. Integrated Healthcare Management, LLCAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2012
- Congel v. MalfitanoAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2011
- Arch Ins. Co. v. Delric Constr. Co., Inc.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2019
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.