Legal Opinion

Oubre v. Borne

Louisiana Court of Appeal

Decided October 13, 1976No. 7991PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

REDMANN, Judge.

On our motion we dismiss a wife’s appeal seeking increase in alimony because we lack “jurisdiction,” C.C.P. 2088; Malone v. Malone, La.1973, 282 So.2d 119. Appellant filed neither bond nor motion to proceed in forma pauperis within the 30 days of C.C.P. 3943.

Appellant asserts that she mailed her forma pauperis motion to the trial judge on the day before the 30th day and argues that it presumably was received on the 30th day. Had it been properly and timely presented, the judge’s failure to timely sign it would not defeat the appeal; Graves v. Kaiser Alum. & Chem. Corp.,…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Malone v. MaloneSupreme Court of Louisiana · 1973
  2. Johnson v. State Farm Mutual Automobile Ins. Co.Louisiana Court of Appeal · 1970
  3. Graves v. Kaiser Aluminum and Chemical Corp.Supreme Court of Louisiana · 1975

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. Hough v. Brookshire Grocery Co.Louisiana Court of Appeal · 1993
  2. Webster v. WebsterLouisiana Court of Appeal · 1981

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API