Legal Opinion

Oxford Consumer Discount Co. v. Stefanelli

Supreme Court of New Jersey

Decided March 17, 1970PublishedCited by 43 opinions

1Per curiam

Subject to a qualification to be stated, the judgment of the Appellate Division is affirmed substantially for the reasons expressed below in the exhaustive opinions of Judge Conford. Oxford Consumer Dis. Co. of No. Phila. v. Stefanelli, 102 N. J. Super. 549 (App. Div. 1968), and 104 N. J. Super. 512 (App. Div. 1969).

The first opinion of the Appellate Division was handed down on September 11, 1968. Prior to that date certain New Jersey borrowers other than the defendants Stefanellis had brought suit against First Mercantile Discount Company and another Pennsylvania loan company in the Superior…

Also in this document: Dissent.

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. People v. Wong Ah YouCalifornia Supreme Court · 1885
  2. Fairfax Family Fund, Inc. v. CaliforniaSupreme Court of the United States · 1965
  3. People v. Fairfax Family Fund, Inc.California Court of Appeal · 1964

3Cited by43 opinions

  1. Montells v. HaynesSupreme Court of New Jersey · 1993
  2. State v. BursteinSupreme Court of New Jersey · 1981
  3. Brunetti v. Borough of New MilfordSupreme Court of New Jersey · 1975
  4. Coons v. American Honda Motor Co., Inc.Supreme Court of New Jersey · 1984
  5. Salorio v. GlaserSupreme Court of New Jersey · 1983

38 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API