Legal Opinion
American Brake Shoe & Foundry Co. v. Hoadley Brake Shoe Co.
District Court, D. Massachusetts
Decided March 1, 1915No. 268PublishedCited by 2 opinions
In Equity. Suit by the American'Brake, Shoe & Foundry Company against the Hoadly Brake Shoe Company. On final hearing.
1Opinion of the Court
HAFF, District Judge.
This bill in equity alleges infringement, by the defendant, of United States letters patent No. 651,435, issued June 12, 1900, for a railway brake shoe, to Gardiner W. Chipley, as patentee, and to Charles W. Armbrust, assignee of a one-half interest. The application of Chipley was filed January 18, 1900.
Claims 4, 5, and 6 are in issue, the charge of infringement relating only to those claims. They are as follows:
“4. A brake shoe provided in its wearing face with recesses adapted to receive the attaching and guide lugs upon the back of another shoe, substantially as…
2Cases cited10 opinions
- Continental Paper Bag Co. v. Eastern Paper Bag Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1908
- United States v. American Bell Telephone Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1897
- Boyer v. Keller Tool Co.Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1903
- Epps v. United Box Board & Paper Co.Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1906
- National Tube Co. v. MarkCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1914
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by2 opinions
- I. T. S. Rubber Co. v. Essex Rubber Co.District Court, D. Massachusetts · 1920
- William Carter Co. v. Earnshaw Knitting Co.District Court, D. Massachusetts · 1928