Legal Opinion

John Paterno, Inc. v. Curiale

New York Court of Appeals

Decided June 6, 1996PublishedCited by 23 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION OF THE COURT

ClPARICK, J.

This appeal centers on a determination by the Superintendent of Insurance of the State of New York that petitioners violated Insurance Department Regulation 121 (11 NYCRR part 73) by placing claims-made liquor liability policies in New York through an excess line broker. Petitioners commenced this CPLR article 78 proceeding challenging the Superintendent’s finding that petitioners violated Regulation 121 a total of 1,497 times and that petitioners demonstrated "untrustworthiness” within the meaning of Insurance Law § 2110 (a), and seeking to vacate the penalty…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Gold v. LomenzoNew York Court of Appeals · 1972
  2. New York Public Interest Research Group, Inc. v. New York State Department of InsuranceNew York Court of Appeals · 1985
  3. Medical Malpractice Insurance Ass'n v. Superintendent of InsuranceNew York Court of Appeals · 1988
  4. Chiaino v. LomenzoAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1966
  5. MATTER OF DONATI v. ShafferNew York Court of Appeals · 1994

3Cited by23 opinions

  1. Stephen Fogel Psychological, P.C. v. Progressive Casualty InsuranceAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2006
  2. Featherstone v. FrancoNew York Court of Appeals · 2000
  3. In Re the Liquidation of Union Indemnity InsuranceNew York Court of Appeals · 1998
  4. Diefenthaler v. KleinAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2006
  5. State Farm Mutual Automobile Insurance v. RabinerDistrict Court, E.D. New York · 2010

18 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API