Legal Opinion

Ding Ju Hu v. Office of the Director of Regulation

Mohegan Gaming Disputes Trial Court

Decided January 19, 2005No. GDTC-11-04-115-PMGPublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

MEMORANDUM OF DECISION ON DEFENDANT’S MOTION TO DISMISS

GUERNSEY, Chief Judge.

The Plaintiff, whose gaming license was revoked after a hearing, has appealed such revocation to the Gaming Disputes Trial Court pursuant to MTO 2002-13. The Defendant, Office of Regulation, initially moved to dismiss on grounds that the appeal was not timely filed pursuant to MTO 2002-13 Section 3(c) in that it was not filed “with the Clerk of the Gaming Disputes Court within twenty days after mailing of the final decision by the agency .. .’’. without, however, complying with MTO 2002-13 Section (g) by submitting…

2Cases cited1 opinion

  1. Long v. Mohegan Tribal Gaming AuthorityMohegan Gaming Disputes Trial Court · 1997

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. Rivas v. Office of the Director of RegulationMohegan Gaming Disputes Trial Court · 2009
  2. Rodriguez v. Office of the Director of RegulationMohegan Gaming Disputes Trial Court · 2007

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API