Legal Opinion

Price v. Hovsepian

California Court of Appeal

Decided November 26, 1952No. Civ. 15002PublishedCited by 5 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtDooling, J.

Plaintiffs, who are husband and wife, sued in a single cause of action for unlawful eviction and conversion of certain personal property. The court, sitting without a jury, found that plaintiffs had been wrongfully evicted and awarded them as damages therefor $892.50. The court also found that there had been no conversion of their personal property. Plaintiffs and defendant have both appealed from the judgment.

On defendant’s appeal he raises the question that Mrs. Price was not a party to the action. The action was commenced by her husband as her guardian ad litem at a time when Mrs. Price…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Gruber v. Pacific States Savings & Loan Co.California Supreme Court · 1939
  2. Van Dorn v. CouchCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1937
  3. Pearl v. FigoniCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1942

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. Klim v. JonesDistrict Court, N.D. California · 1970
  2. Culp v. Signal Van & StorageCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1956
  3. Caraway v. BurnsCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1956
  4. Culp v. Signal Van & StorageCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1956
  5. Shin v. ICON FoundationDistrict Court, N.D. California · 2021

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API