Legal Opinion

Sacco v. Prudential-Bache Securities, Inc.

District Court, E.D. Pennsylvania

Decided December 21, 1988No. Civ. A. 88-6457PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

MEMORANDUM AND ORDER

VAN ANTWERPEN, District Judge.

This matter comes before the court on defendants’ Motion to Stay Proceedings pending arbitration and Defendants’ Motion to Stay Discovery. The action arises out of defendants’ alleged “churning” and mismanaging plaintiff Columbus Sacco’s securities account. For the reasons stated below, defendants’ motion to stay proceedings will be granted in part and denied in part; defendants’ motion to stay discovery will be denied.

FACTS

Plaintiff opened a securities account with defendant Prudential-Bache Securities, Inc. (“Pru-Bache”) to which it assigned…

2Cases cited22 opinions

  1. Moses H. Cone Memorial Hospital v. Mercury Construction Corp.Supreme Court of the United States · 1983
  2. Dean Witter Reynolds Inc. v. ByrdSupreme Court of the United States · 1985
  3. Oppenheimer Fund, Inc. v. SandersSupreme Court of the United States · 1978
  4. Shearson/American Express Inc. v. McMahonSupreme Court of the United States · 1987
  5. Wilko v. SwanSupreme Court of the United States · 1953

17 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. Elliott v. AlbrightCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1989
  2. New Castle County v. U.S. Fire InsuranceDistrict Court, D. Delaware · 1989

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API