Legal Opinion

Greenbaum v. Berenson

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

Decided June 15, 1926PublishedCited by 4 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Order granting defendants’ motion to retax costs reversed upon the law, with ten dollars costs and disbursements, and motion denied, with ten dollars costs. The allowance of the item in defendants’ costs of their disbursements of seventy dollars for premium upon a surety bond filed by them is unauthorized by the Civil Practice Act, and is contrary to the decisions made under that act and the Code of Civil Procedure. Had a surety company bond been ordered by the court the situation presented would have been different. Kelly, P. J., Manning, Young, Kapper and Lazansky, JJ., concur.

2Cited by4 opinions

  1. Williams v. Sawyer Bros.Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1931
  2. Dickinson v. Hot Mixed Bituminous IndustryOhio Court of Appeals · 1943
  3. N. R. S. Realty Corp. v. Bernard S. Forman, Inc.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1927
  4. Williams v. Sawyer Bros.Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1931