Legal Opinion

Travelers Indemnity Co. v. AMR Services Corp.

District Court, S.D. New York

Decided March 14, 1996No. 91 Civ. 1311 (BN)PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION, FINDINGS OF FACT AND CONCLUSIONS OF LAW

NEWMAN, Senior Judge of the United

States Court of International Trade, sitting as a United States District Court judge by designation: 1

INTRODUCTION

This is a diversity action within the purview of 28 U.S.C. § 1332(a)(1) commenced by The Travelers Indemnity Co. (“Travelers”), an insurance carrier and subrogee of its insured, Horizon Associates, New York (“Horizon”), against AMR Services Corp. (“AMR”). Travelers sued AMR to recover damages in the sum of $160,833.23, representing the value of the insured goods stolen while stored in AMR’s customs…

2Cases cited23 opinions

  1. Hooper Associates Ltd. v. AGS Computers, Inc.New York Court of Appeals · 1989
  2. McDermott v. City of New YorkNew York Court of Appeals · 1980
  3. Kirke La Shelle Co. v. Paul Armstrong Co.New York Court of Appeals · 1933
  4. Trans World Airlines, Inc. v. Franklin Mint Corp.Supreme Court of the United States · 1984
  5. Trustees of Columbia University v. Mitchell/Giurgola AssociatesAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1985

18 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. Pollack v. Safeway Steel Products, Inc.District Court, S.D. New York · 2006
  2. One Beacon Insurance v. Orange & Rockland Utilities, Inc.District Court, S.D. New York · 2005

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API