Legal Opinion

Fort Worth & Rio Grande Railway Co. v. Greer

Court of Appeals of Texas

Decided June 6, 1903PublishedCited by 4 opinions

Appeal from the District Court of Parker. Tried below before Hon. J. W. Patterson.

1Opinion of the Court

STEPHENS, Associate Justice.

—For a statement of the case see the opinion on former appeal. 29 Texas Civ. App., 561, 5 Texas Ct. Rep., 541; 69 S. W. Rep., 421.

The train, which collided with the wagon in which appellees were riding along Adams Street in Fort Worth was less than eighty rods from the crossing when it started, and it is therefore contended that article 4507 of the Revised Statutes was wholly inapplicable to this case. It was held on the former appeal that this article did not require the whistle to be blown within eighty rods of the crossing, but it does, we think, require the…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. Missouri, Kansas & Texas Railway Co. v. MageeTexas Supreme Court · 1899
  2. Fort Worth & Rio Grande Railway Co. v. GreerCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1902

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. Pittsburgh, Cincinnati, Chicago & St. Louis Railway Co. v. TerrellIndiana Supreme Court · 1911
  2. Missouri, O. & G. Ry. Co. v. AdamsSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1915
  3. Texarkana & Ft. S. Ry. Co. v. ReaCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1915
  4. Burton v. Nacogdoches Crate & Lumber Co.Court of Appeals of Texas · 1913

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API