Legal Opinion
In Re GRAND JURY
Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit
Decided February 16, 2011No. 10-3527PublishedCited by 14 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
SMITH, Circuit Judge.
The appellant is a target of a grand jury investigation. In connection with the investigation, federal agents executed a warrant to search the appellant’s property and seized numerous documents. To accommodate the appellant, the agents agreed to furnish him with copies of all seized documents. Unsatisfied, the appellant moved for return of the documents, as well as any copies, on the ground that the search and seizure violated the Fourth Amendment. The District Court denied the motion, and this appeal followed. As explained below, we lack jurisdiction to review the…
2Cases cited11 opinions
- DiBella v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1962
- United States v. John VoigtCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1996
- United States v. Premises Known as 608 Taylor Ave., Apartment 302, Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania Appeal of Harold MargolisCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1978
- Government of the Virgin Islands v. George EdwardsCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1990
- In Re Search Warrant (Sealed)Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1987
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by14 opinions
- Estate of Adriano Roman, Jr. v. City of NewarkCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 2019
- Barna v. Board of School Directors of the Panther Valley School DistrictCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 2017
- United States v. Sealed Search WarrantsCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 2017
- In Re Search of Electronic CommunicationsCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 2015
- In re Sealed CaseCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 2013
9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.