Legal Opinion

Rawstorne v. Maguire

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

Decided January 19, 1934PublishedCited by 1 opinion

1Opinion of the CourtTownley, J.

Defendant, appellant, appears specially and moves to set aside the service of summons on the ground that he is not a resident of New York and is consequently not subject to service by substitution under section 230 of the Civil Practice Act. Section 230 authorizes an order for substituted service against a person “ residing within the State.” The question is whether defendant *2at the time he was served was “ residing ” in New York within the meaning of this section.

The defendant occupied a room at the Vanderbilt Hotel in New York city, whenever he happened to be in New York, from May 7, 1932,…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Pennoyer v. NeffSupreme Court of the United States · 1878
  2. New York Life Insurance v. DunlevySupreme Court of the United States · 1916
  3. Leighty v. TichenorAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1916

3Cited by1 opinion

  1. Rawstorne v. MaguireAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1934

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API