Legal Opinion

Udani v. United States

District Court, E.D. Michigan

Decided September 26, 1989No. 89-71051PublishedCited by 1 opinion

1Opinion of the Court

AMENDED MEMORANDUM AND ORDER *

COHN, District Judge.

I

This is an action for the recovery of taxes erroneously or illegally collected. Plaintiffs Pravin and Asha Udani seek to recover an overpayment of $4,327.00 from the tax year ending December 31, 1980. Plaintiffs allege that the Court has jurisdiction over their case under the provisions of 28 U.S.C. § 1346(a)(1). Because venue in actions brought pursuant to § 1346(a)(1) is governed by 28 U.S.C. § 1402(a)(1), defendant United States asserts that venue is proper only in the district where plaintiffs reside. Defendant moves to dismiss or…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. George Caleshu v. Hon. H. Kenneth Wangelin, United States District Judge for the Eastern District of MissouriCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1977
  2. TerKeurst v. United StatesDistrict Court, W.D. Michigan · 1982

3Cited by1 opinion

  1. Wallace v. United StatesDistrict Court, District of Columbia · 2008

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API