Legal Opinion · Dissent

Lohmiller v. Weidenbaugh

Supreme Court of Pennsylvania

Decided December 30, 1983No. 97 E.D. Appeal Docket 1982Published

1DissentZappala, Justice

I dissent from the majority’s finding that Hazel Lohmiller must be joined in the partition action.

A tenancy by the entireties is a form of co-ownership that exists only between husband and wife and is presumed to exist whenever property is held in their joint names. It is characterized by the four unities of interest, title, time, and possession. Each spouse is entitled to enjoyment of the whole and a right of survivorship. Neither has an individual portion that can be alienated, separated, or reached by creditors, Madden v. Gosztonyi Savings & Trust Co., 331 Pa. 476, 200 A. 624 (1938).…

2Cases cited9 opinions

  1. Madden v. Glosztonyi Savings & Trust Co.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1938
  2. Lykiardopoulos v. LykiardopoulosSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1973
  3. Lazare v. LazareSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1950
  4. Estate of KotzSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1979
  5. Michael EstateSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1966

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API