Legal Opinion
Tyrnauer v. Travelers Insurance
New York Supreme Court
Decided October 15, 1958PublishedCited by 5 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtLouis L. Friedman, J.
In an action for a declaratory judgment plaintiffs move pursuant to rule 113 of the Rules of Civil Practice, for summary judgment. The defendants cross move for similar relief. The declaration sought by the plaintiffs is that the plaintiffs are insured under a policy of insurance issued by the defendants for an accident which occurred on August 6, 1956.
Plaintiff Ignatz Tyrnauer (hereinafter referred to as Ignatz) was on July 8, 1955 the registered owner of a 1953 Chevrolet station wagon. On said date the defendants issued to him an *19automobile liability policy for a period of one year covering…
2Cases cited8 opinions
- Lavine v. Indemnity Insurance Co. of North AmericaNew York Court of Appeals · 1933
- Whipple v. . Prudential Ins. Co.New York Court of Appeals · 1917
- Abrams v. Maryland Casualty Co.New York Court of Appeals · 1949
- Ætna Casualty & Surety Co. v. General Casualty Co. of AmericaAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1955
- Truglio v. Zurich General Accident & Liability InsuranceNew York Court of Appeals · 1928
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by5 opinions
- Fili v. Matson Motors, Inc.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1992
- Holmes v. Nationwide Mutual InsuranceNew York Supreme Court · 1963
- Pettinelli Motors, Inc. v. Morreale, New York County Courts1963
- Tyrnauer v. Travelers InsuranceAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1959
- North Texas Producers Ass'n v. Employers Mutual Casualty Co.District Court, E.D. Texas · 1962