Legal Opinion

Skjonsby v. Ness

North Dakota Supreme Court

Decided June 14, 1974No. Civ. 9001PublishedCited by 26 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

CLIFFORD JANSONIUS, District Judge, retired; now Supreme Court Commissioner.

The legal issue in this case arises by virtue of an order of the trial court reducing a jury verdict or, in lieu thereof, granting a new trial. The main issue, therefore, is whether the trial court was justified in reducing the verdict or if such reduction amounted to an abuse of the court’s discretion. The pertinent part of the order reads as follows:

“It is hereby ordered that the motion of the defendant for judgment notwithstanding the verdict is denied and that the motion of the defendant for a new trial is…

Also in this document: Per curiam.

2Cases cited23 opinions

  1. Reeves v. CatignaniTennessee Supreme Court · 1928
  2. Leonard v. North Dakota Co-Operative Wool Marketing Ass'nNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 1942
  3. Larson v. MeyerNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 1965
  4. McCurdy v. HughesNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 1933
  5. Reid v. EhrNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 1917

18 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by26 opinions

  1. Wall v. Pennsylvania Life Insurance Co.North Dakota Supreme Court · 1979
  2. Olson v. A. W. Chesterton Co.North Dakota Supreme Court · 1977
  3. Cook v. StenslieNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 1977
  4. Johnson v. Monsanto Co.North Dakota Supreme Court · 1981
  5. Stoner v. Nash Finch, Inc.North Dakota Supreme Court · 1989

21 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API