Legal Opinion · Dissent

Bailey v. Weinberger, Secretary of Health, Education, and Welfare

Supreme Court of the United States

Decided December 9, 1974No. 73-7019Published

1Dissent

Mr. Justice White, joined by Mr. Justice Douglas and Mr. Justice Stewart,

dissenting.

The Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit, adhering to its previous decisions in Stuckey v. Weinberger, 488 F. 2d 904 (1973) (en banc), and Wallace v. Weinberger, 488 F. 2d 606 (1973) (en banc), cert. denied, 417 U. S. 913 (1974), held in this case that the decision of the Secretary of HEW on a request to reopen a previous denial on the merits of a claim for benefits is so far committed to agency discretion by the provisions of § 205 (h) of the Social Security Act, 49 Stat. 624, as amended, 53 Stat. 1371, 60…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Cappadora v. CelebrezzeCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1966
  2. Leonard P. Stuckey v. Caspar W. Weinberger, Secretary of Health, Education, and WelfareCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1973
  3. Leilla Davis v. Elliot L. Richardson, Secretary of Health, Education and WelfareCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1972
  4. Richard Maddox v. Elliot L. Richardson, Secretary of Health, Education and WelfareCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1972
  5. Charlton L. Wallace v. Caspar W. Weinberger, Secretary of Health, Education and WelfareCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1973

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API