Legal Opinion

In re Taxes B. P. Bishop Estate

Hawaii Supreme Court

Decided May 22, 1923No. 1450PublishedCited by 5 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION OF THE COURT BY

PERRY, J.

This is an appeal from a decision of the tax appeal court sustaining the assessment placed by the assessor upon land of the taxpayer-appellant. The property assessed contains nn area of 519,844 squaye feet but is leased in subdivisions or lots to various tenants. The *191return was made by the taxpayer upon that portion of an ordinary tax return blank which is entitled “Lessor’s Eeturn of Eeal Property Leased” and in the return as made the various lots are enumerated, the two royal patents or grants of which they all form a part are set forth, the area is given…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. In re the Assessment of Taxes on the Following Sugar PlantationsHawaii Supreme Court · 1897
  2. In re Assessment of Taxes, CastleHawaii Supreme Court · 1903
  3. In re Assessment of Taxes, Kash Co.Hawaii Supreme Court · 1904
  4. In re Assessment of Taxes, Kapiolani Estate, Ltd.Hawaii Supreme Court · 1913

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. Somers v. City of MeridenSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1934
  2. In re Taxes EstateHawaii Supreme Court · 1934
  3. Re Taxes Bishop Est.Hawaii Supreme Court · 1934
  4. CAF Investment Co. v. Saginaw TownshipMichigan Supreme Court · 1981
  5. CAF Investment Co. v. Saginaw TownshipMichigan Supreme Court · 1981

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API