William Taylor Sons Co. v. Burton.

OPINION

By LEVINE, J.

It is of some .importance at this point to state that .the record shows that the sales slips were destroyed by the defendant corporation after a lapse of two years in the regular course of its business.

No further evidence being offered, the court rendered judgment in favor of the defendant. An exception was duly noted.

On the question of the exclusion of the ledger from the evidence, there are two inquiries before this court: (1). Are the plaintiff’s ledgers admissible as primary evidence under the book account or regular entry exception to the Hearsay Rule without the…