Legal Opinion · Dissent

Aberdeen Savings & Loan Ass'n v. Chase

Washington Supreme Court

Decided June 12, 1930No. 22228. En BancPublished

1DissentFullerton, J.

(dissenting) — While I agree with the conclusion reached by Judge Holcomb in his dissenting opinion, I wish to notice with more particularity some of the questions he has noticed but generally.

The majority, it will be observed from the concluding part of their opinion, rest their conclusion that the act in controversy is in contravention of the Federal constitution, because it denies to tbe complainants tbe equal protection of the laws, and is in contravention of the Federal laws because it taxes tax-exempt securities. To reach these conclusions, the majority hold, and must necessarily hold,…

2Cases cited9 opinions

  1. Quaker City Cab Co. v. Commonwealth of PennsylvaniaSupreme Court of the United States · 1928
  2. MacAllen Co. v. MassachusettsSupreme Court of the United States · 1929
  3. Puget Sound Power & Light Co. v. City of SeattleWashington Supreme Court · 1921
  4. Commercial Electric Light & Power Co. v. JudsonWashington Supreme Court · 1899
  5. Edison Electric Illuminating Co. v. Spokane CountyWashington Supreme Court · 1900

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API