Legal Opinion

Fortin v. Fortin

Supreme Judicial Court of Maine

Decided July 9, 1943Published

1Opinion of the CourtSturgis, C. J.

This action on a promissory note was tried in the court below without a jury and with right to exceptions as to matters of law reserved. On issue joined on a plea of want of consideration, the decision was for the plaintiff for the full amount of the note, and the defendant reserved an exception. The case having been remanded for correction of the bill of exceptions and re-entered, it is in order for review and the motion to dismiss now filed, having no procedural warrant, must be dismissed.

Out of the maze of its inconsistencies, the record discloses that Floredo Fortin, the administrator d.…

2Cases cited9 opinions

  1. Boales v. FergusonNebraska Supreme Court · 1898
  2. Palmer v. Estate of PalmerSupreme Judicial Court of Maine · 1909
  3. Parker v. Providence & Stonington Steamboat Co.Supreme Court of Rhode Island · 1891
  4. Wallin v. SmolenskyMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1939
  5. O'Rourke v. SullivanMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1941

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API