Legal Opinion

Attorney General Opinion No.

Kansas Attorney General Reports

Decided June 30, 1995Published

1Opinion of the Court

The Honorable Daniel Thimesch State Representative, 93rd District 30121 W. 63rd South Cheney, Kansas 67025

Dear Representative Thimesch:

As representative of the 93rd district and on behalf of a constituent you inquire about the relationship between K.S.A.66-129, dealing with the authority of the Kansas corporation commission (KCC) to audit the accounting of certain public utilities, and K.S.A. 66-129a, authorizing the audit of public utilities that engage in private enterprise. Specifically, you ask whether the KCC must exercise its authority to examine and audit a regulated utility's accounts…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. Martindale v. TennySupreme Court of Kansas · 1992
  2. State ex rel. Public Utilities Commission v. Atchison, Topeka & Santa Fe Railway Co.Supreme Court of Kansas · 1923

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API