Legal Opinion

State v. Arrington

Ohio Court of Appeals

Decided February 3, 1984No. E-83-36PublishedCited by 35 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtHandwork, J.

This case is before the court on appeal from a judgment of the Erie County Court of Common Pleas.

The essential facts may be summarized as follows. On September 14,1983, the trial court granted defendant-appellee’s motion to suppress certain statements he made to Sandusky police detectives during his interrogation. The detectives had questioned appellee, Raymond Arrington, on June 10, 1983, about the circumstances of a shooting involving appellee and another suspect, James Cherry. The interrogation session was tape-recorded.

The shooting being investigated had occurred earlier on May 26, 1983.…

Also in this document: Concurrence.

2Cases cited20 opinions

  1. Miranda v. ArizonaSupreme Court of the United States · 1966
  2. Townsend v. SainSupreme Court of the United States · 1963
  3. Malloy v. HoganSupreme Court of the United States · 1964
  4. Mincey v. ArizonaSupreme Court of the United States · 1978
  5. Lego v. TwomeySupreme Court of the United States · 1972

15 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by35 opinions

  1. State v. BaysOhio Supreme Court · 1999
  2. State v. LawrenceSupreme Court of Connecticut · 2007
  3. State v. JamesSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1996
  4. State v. MariniSupreme Court of Rhode Island · 1994
  5. State v. PetitjeanOhio Court of Appeals · 2000

30 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API