Dingman v. Raymond
Supreme Court of Minnesota
Appeal by defendant from a judgment of the district court for Goodhue county, Crosby, J., presiding, on appeal from justice court, in an action by plaintiff to recover possession of a buggy, taken under execution by defendant as constable.
1Opinion of the CourtBerry, J.
The stipulation of the parties and the findings of the district court, with reference to the thing in controversy, are “that said buggy is a single-seated, one-horse, covered vehicle or pleasure carriage, designed and adapted for carrying persons only, and as such was used by said plaintiff; and the same was the only buggy or wagon owned •by plaintiff at the time of said levy.” Gen. St. 1878, c. 66, § 310, exempts from sale on execution “one wagon, cart, or dray, one sleigh, two plows, one drag, and other farming utensils * * * not exceeding $300 in value.” I am of opinion that this does not…
2Cited by2 opinions
- Allen v. CoatesSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1882
- State v. Northwestern College of Speech Arts, Inc.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1934