Legal Opinion

Anderson v. Cole

Michigan Supreme Court

Decided October 25, 1897PublishedCited by 2 opinions

Error to Clinton; Daboll, J. Assumpsit by James C. Anderson against Ezra Al Cole, impleaded with Bradley B. Bennett, upon promissory notes. From a default judgment for plaintiff, defendant brings error.

1Opinion of the CourtMontgomery, J.

The writ of error in this case brings up the record only, no bill of exceptions having been settled. Suit was instituted by filing a declaration, and *638entering a rule to plead, on February 28, 1896. Default was entered on the 23d of November, 1896. At this date no proof was on file showing service upon the defendant. It is conceded that this was an irregularity for which judgment should be set aside. Johnson v. Delbridge, 35 Mich. 436. A return was subsequently (December 1, 1896) made, but this return failed to show service of notice of the rule to plead. It is contended by defendant’s counsel…

2Cases cited1 opinion

  1. Johnson v. DelbridgeMichigan Supreme Court · 1877

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. Rosen v. Wayne Circuit JudgeMichigan Supreme Court · 1928
  2. Burk v. AmosMichigan Supreme Court · 1933

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API