Farrington v. Bushnell
Washington Supreme Court
Appeal from a judgment of the superior court for Thurs-ton county, Mitchell, J., entered January 28, 1915, in favor of the plaintiff, in an action to foreclose a mechanics’ lien, tried to the court.
1Opinion of the CourtMain, J.
The purpose of this action was to foreclose a lien for the balance claimed to- be due for labor and material furnished by the plaintiff to the defendants. The complaint contained three causes of action, the first of which was based upon an oral contract, wherein, as the plaintiff alleges in general terms, he was employed by the defendant G. M. Bushnell to paint the outside of the defendants’ dwelling house and the concrete basement thereof, the foreman’s cottage, and the conservatory and greenhouse, and to finish and decorate the new part of the defendants’ dwelling, all for the agreed price…
2Cited by3 opinions
- Standard Lumber Co. v. FieldsWashington Supreme Court · 1947
- Dietz v. BartellWashington Supreme Court · 1922
- Caine-Grimshaw Co. v. WhiteWashington Supreme Court · 1925