Legal Opinion

Dearman v. Mallard Bay Drilling, Inc.

Louisiana Court of Appeal

Decided April 7, 1993No. 92-469Published

1Opinion of the Court

LABORDE, Judge.

Plaintiff, Jimmy Dearman, appeals the decision of the trial court sustaining defendant’s, Mallard Bay Drilling, Inc., exceptions of no cause of action and res judicata in this Jones Act case concerning a release and a loss of consortium claim by the injured seaman’s wife and children. Finding no error on the part of the trial court, we affirm.

FACTS

Plaintiff, Jimmy Dean Dearman (Mr. Dearman), a Mississippi resident, was hired by defendant, Mallard Bay Drilling, Inc. (Mallard) as a roustabout aboard a jack up rig located in Mobile Bay, Alabama. On June 26, 1990, Mr. Dearman…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Miles v. Apex Marine Corp.Supreme Court of the United States · 1990
  2. Bryson Properties, XVIII v. Travelers Insurance Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1992
  3. Leroy Michel, Jr. And Cindy Michel, Cross-Appellants v. Total Transportation, Inc. And Assuranceforeningen Gard, Cross-AppelleesCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1992
  4. Murray v. Bertucci Construction CompanyCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1992
  5. Boudreaux v. LeBlancLouisiana Court of Appeal · 1987

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API