Baird v. United States
Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit
In Error to the District Court of the United States for the Eastern District of Tennessee; Edward T. Sanford, Judge. Sam C. Baird was convicted of operating a distillery, contrary to the revenue laws, and of using foods; in the production of distilled spirits, contrary to the Eever Act, and he brings error.
1Per curiam
Plaintiff in error was prosecuted under an indictment containing three counts — the first, under R. S. § 3281 (Comp. St. *511§ 6021), for carrying on a distillery without giving bond; the second, under R. S. § 3279 (Comp. St. § 6019), for working in a distillery on which no sign “registered distillery” was placed and kept; the third, under section 15 of Lever Act Aug. 10, 1917, c. 53, 40 Stat. 276, 282 (1918 Supp. Fed. St. Ann. 181, 188, 189; Comp. St. 1918, Comp. St. Ann. Supp. 1919, § 3115%/). for using foods and food materials in the production of distilled spirits for beverage purposes. There…
2Cases cited17 opinions
- United States v. L. Cohen Grocery Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1921
- Burton v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1906
- Crawford v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1909
- Claassen v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1891
- Pierce v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1920
12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by9 opinions
- Robilio v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1923
- Metcalf v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1952
- United States v. HoffaDistrict Court, E.D. Tennessee · 1965
- Bullock v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1923
- Belcher v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1931
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.