Legal Opinion

State ex rel. Griffith v. Anderson

Supreme Court of Kansas

Decided January 10, 1925No. 25,707PublishedCited by 8 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

The opinion of the court was delivered by

Mason, J.:

On rehearing the defendant urges that a violation by a clerk of the district court of the statute referred to in the original opinion, forbidding county officers to retain any compensation or reward for doing anything appertaining to the duties of their office (R. S. 21-1607), is not a misdemeanor because the section fixing a penalty therefor has been repealed. The basis of the contention is this: Section 5 of the original act (Laws 1867, ch. 132; Gen. Stat. 1868, ch. 31, pp. 389-390), of which the provision above referred to formed section…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Weight v. CunninghamTennessee Supreme Court · 1905
  2. State v. ButtignoniWashington Supreme Court · 1921
  3. State v. BeerySupreme Court of Kansas · 1918
  4. Blake ex rel. Blake v. Board of EducationSupreme Court of Kansas · 1922
  5. Evans v. AdamsSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1878

3Cited by8 opinions

  1. State of Oregon v. DavisOregon Supreme Court · 1956
  2. State Ex Rel. Board of Pharmacy Examiners v. McEwenSupreme Court of Iowa · 1959
  3. Miller v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Oklahoma · 1957
  4. Berry v. PetersonSupreme Court of Kansas · 1927
  5. Drumn v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Oklahoma · 1957

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API