First Nat. Bank of New Boston v. Daniel
Court of Appeals of Texas
1Opinion of the CourtWillson, C. J.
(after stating the facts as above). [1] The statute of limitations ceased to run against appellant’s cause of action on the renewal note made by O. J. Daniel February 27, 1909, when he died December 24, 1912. Unless the statute commenced to run again on January 6, 1913, when said O. J. Daniel’s widow, as the survivor of the marriage, became entitled, because of her compliance with the law, to control, manage, and dispose of the community estate between her and her deceased husband, appellant’s action was not barred, and on the facts found by the court below the judgment should have been for…
2Cases cited6 opinions
- Moody v. SmootTexas Supreme Court · 1890
- Carter v. ConnerTexas Supreme Court · 1883
- Hollingsworth v. DavisTexas Supreme Court · 1884
- Brackett v. DevineTexas Supreme Court · 1860
- Jones v. McRaeCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1897
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by2 opinions
- Clark v. First Nat. Bank of New BostonTexas Commission of Appeals · 1919
- Hurst v. CrawfordCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1919