Legal Opinion

Hughes v. Division of Family Services

Supreme Court of Delaware

Decided October 29, 2003No. 95,2002PublishedCited by 15 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

HOLLAND, Justice.

The respondents-appellants, Susan Hughes (the “Mother”) and Walter H. Vernon (the “Father”, or collectively, “the parents”), filed a timely notice of appeal with this Court from a final judgment of the Family Court. Pursuant to that judgment, the Family Court granted the petition of the Division of Family Services (“DFS”), petitioner-appellee, to terminate the Mother’s and the Father’s parental rights.

The Mother and the Father have raised three issues on appeal. First, they argue that the decision of the Family Court to terminate their parental rights, based on the couple’s…

2Cases cited16 opinions

  1. Chapman v. CaliforniaSupreme Court of the United States · 1967
  2. Mathews v. EldridgeSupreme Court of the United States · 1976
  3. Lassiter v. Department of Social Servs. of Durham Cty.Supreme Court of the United States · 1981
  4. Carr v. StateSupreme Court of Delaware · 1989
  5. Shepherd v. ClemensSupreme Court of Delaware · 2000

11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by15 opinions

  1. Powell v. Department of Services for Children, Youth & Their FamiliesSupreme Court of Delaware · 2008
  2. in Int. of B.HSupreme Court of Colorado · 2021
  3. People Ex Rel. South Dakota Department of Social ServicesSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 2004
  4. People ex rel. R.DColorado Court of Appeals · 2012
  5. The PEOPLE of the State of Colorado, IN the INTEREST OF Minor Child: B.H. and B.H., Minor Child v. D.H.Supreme Court of Colorado · 2021

10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API