Legal Opinion

United States Ex Rel. Heineman-Guta v. Guidant Corp.

Court of Appeals for the First Circuit

Decided May 31, 2013No. 12-1867PublishedCited by 25 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

THOMPSON, Circuit Judge.

Appellant Heidi Heineman-Guta (“Heineman-Guta”), on behalf of the United States, brought a qui tam action under the False Claims Act (“FCA”), 31 U.S.C. § 3729 et seq., against Guidant Corporation (“Guidant”) and Boston Scientific Corporation (“BSC”) alleging they engaged in a kickback scheme to promote'the sale and use of their cardiac rhythm management devices. The district court dismissed Heineman-Guta’s complaint for lack of subject matter jurisdiction under Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 12(b)(1) on the basis that an earlier-filed complaint barred consideration of…

2Cases cited21 opinions

  1. Russello v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1983
  2. Keene Corp. v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1993
  3. Rockwell International Corp. v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 2007
  4. United States of America, Ex Rel. Springfield Terminal Railway Company David A. Fink v. Francis X. QuinnCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1994
  5. Boyle v. Hasbro, Inc.Court of Appeals for the First Circuit · 1996

16 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by25 opinions

  1. Mulder v. Kohl's Department Stores, Inc.Court of Appeals for the First Circuit · 2017
  2. United States Ex. Rel. Kelly v. Novartis Pharmaceuticals Corp.Court of Appeals for the First Circuit · 2016
  3. US ex rel. Wilson v. Bristol-Myers SquibbCourt of Appeals for the First Circuit · 2014
  4. United States ex rel. Wood v. Allergan, Inc.District Court, S.D. New York · 2017
  5. McGuire v. Estate of Robert CunninghamCourt of Appeals for the First Circuit · 2019

20 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API