United States Ex Rel. Heineman-Guta v. Guidant Corp.
Court of Appeals for the First Circuit
1Opinion of the Court
THOMPSON, Circuit Judge.
Appellant Heidi Heineman-Guta (“Heineman-Guta”), on behalf of the United States, brought a qui tam action under the False Claims Act (“FCA”), 31 U.S.C. § 3729 et seq., against Guidant Corporation (“Guidant”) and Boston Scientific Corporation (“BSC”) alleging they engaged in a kickback scheme to promote'the sale and use of their cardiac rhythm management devices. The district court dismissed Heineman-Guta’s complaint for lack of subject matter jurisdiction under Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 12(b)(1) on the basis that an earlier-filed complaint barred consideration of…
2Cases cited21 opinions
- Russello v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1983
- Keene Corp. v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1993
- Rockwell International Corp. v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 2007
- United States of America, Ex Rel. Springfield Terminal Railway Company David A. Fink v. Francis X. QuinnCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1994
- Boyle v. Hasbro, Inc.Court of Appeals for the First Circuit · 1996
16 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by25 opinions
- Mulder v. Kohl's Department Stores, Inc.Court of Appeals for the First Circuit · 2017
- United States Ex. Rel. Kelly v. Novartis Pharmaceuticals Corp.Court of Appeals for the First Circuit · 2016
- US ex rel. Wilson v. Bristol-Myers SquibbCourt of Appeals for the First Circuit · 2014
- United States ex rel. Wood v. Allergan, Inc.District Court, S.D. New York · 2017
- McGuire v. Estate of Robert CunninghamCourt of Appeals for the First Circuit · 2019
20 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.